Click here for the introduction to the Round and Square series about Marcel Granet, "La Pensée Cyclique"
This series is dedicated to understanding one of the most fascinating intellects of the twentieth century, Marcel Granet (1884-1940). In an earlier era, he might have been considered (at least by bibliophiles considering tomes ranging from De l'esprit des lois to 呂氏春秋 between the world wars) the most interesting man in the world. For me, he is every bit of that (as we say back home). Granet's range of interests in social theory and Chinese literature were profound, catholic, and engrossing. I hope that (whether you are interested in French, social theory, or Chinese) you will give Monsieur Granet a little bit of your attention. The material is not simple, by any means, but it is an ideal way to grasp how knowledge really works.
Ideal and Reality
[a] Round-square/east-west/never-twain RF |
Ideal and Reality
In the course of wintering in the common house, the husbandmen, by dint of
jousts and expensive orgies, learned to have confidence
in their virile virtues.
Their prestige
increased in proportion as their clearings extended. But the
Founder Heroes did not derive their
glory solely from the fact that they had
subdued the soil and conquered the
brushwood with fire. In yet another
manner
they are Masters of Fire. They
are potters or smiths. They know how to
make
the divine vessels by means of holy and tragic unions. All the dynastic virtue is
incorporated in
the magic cauldrons cast by Yu the Great, exactly as it might be
in a Holy
Mountain or River. These latter crumble
away or dry up when the Virtue
of a Race is exhausted and totters. In the same way, when this virtue is too much
enfeebled the cauldrons lose their weight. They depart of themselves, to another
master to be charged anew with
prestige.
[b] Real/ideal 1907 RF |
It will also not be lost on any reader that Granet does
not use guarded language in describing the “reality” of their mythical-kingly
actions. These anecdotes lead Granet to
a point that combines his profound learning in different areas. It is particularly interesting to see
Granet’s use of the “facts” in this passage.
The juxtaposition of these facts suggests a
hypothesis. Brotherhoods of
artificers from the body of husbandmen became the guardians of magic
knowledge and masters
of the secret of the primeval powers.
The existence
of rival brotherhoods presupposes a center whose organization is no longer
founded on simple bipartition [as found in earlier forms of Chinese society].
Now, according to the most ancient Chinese conceptions which are known to
us, the Universe (the Universe is not distinguishable from Society) is made up
of sections whose Virtues are in opposition and alternation. These Virtues are
materialized under the likeness of Winds. The Eight Winds correspond not only
to divisions of the human and natural world, but also to magic powers. Everything
is divided in the domain of the Eight Winds but together they preside over music
and dancing. It is the function of dancing and music to tame the world and
subdue nature for men’s profit.
of rival brotherhoods presupposes a center whose organization is no longer
founded on simple bipartition [as found in earlier forms of Chinese society].
Now, according to the most ancient Chinese conceptions which are known to
us, the Universe (the Universe is not distinguishable from Society) is made up
of sections whose Virtues are in opposition and alternation. These Virtues are
materialized under the likeness of Winds. The Eight Winds correspond not only
to divisions of the human and natural world, but also to magic powers. Everything
is divided in the domain of the Eight Winds but together they preside over music
and dancing. It is the function of dancing and music to tame the world and
subdue nature for men’s profit.
[c] Ether-real RF |
Toward that end, he employs the fundamental ideas of opposition and alternation in early Chinese thought with the divine winds, all of which are brought together in singing and dancing, whose function it was “to tame the world and subdue nature for men’s profit.” Granet is certainly not a hard-headed “realist,” impatient with any but “practical explanations.” His desire to articulate real social changes in early China, however, show him to be anything but a fuzzy thinker, chasing after symbolic permutations far beyond the practical world.
Indeed, it is difficult to sort “ideal” from “real,”
“practical” from “ethereal,” in Granet’s accounts, as we shall see in his
continuation of the passage above:
In most of the mythical dramas, in which the legend of a
foundation of power is
commemorated, beings with the traits of dynastic ancestors or heraldic beasts,
are represented as ruling a section of the world, and these, in many cases,
appear in the form of Winds. We have then the right to suppose that a division
into marshaled groups was substituted for, or rather superimposed upon, the
twofold organization of society, each being appointed to one department of the
Universe and all working in concert—dancing, playing games, rivaling each other
in prestige—for the upholding of a single order. From these rivalries and these
games, sprang a new order of society, a hierarchical order founded upon prestige.
commemorated, beings with the traits of dynastic ancestors or heraldic beasts,
are represented as ruling a section of the world, and these, in many cases,
appear in the form of Winds. We have then the right to suppose that a division
into marshaled groups was substituted for, or rather superimposed upon, the
twofold organization of society, each being appointed to one department of the
Universe and all working in concert—dancing, playing games, rivaling each other
in prestige—for the upholding of a single order. From these rivalries and these
games, sprang a new order of society, a hierarchical order founded upon prestige.
[d] Ideal (International Plaza) RF |
Granet, in just the first few pages of a chapter analyzing the important theme of brotherhoods in China (so important that they have figured prominently in even the recent history of China), he mixes a set of of unapologetically mythical themes with sociological analysis that represents a mix of Durkheimian social theory and Granet’s personal study of Chinese kinship. Patiently explaining the mythological themes and articulating the sociological issues relevant to his case, he mixes them with dancing, music, and wind—voilà, there are rival brotherhoods where a simple kind of social solidarity once stood.
It is, at once, rigorous and sensitive to the Chinese sources and cultural traditions. It is also a kind of scholarship that many readers have found unusual, perplexing, or both. Those readers not confounded by the details of sociological theory or the abstractions found in Chinese sources are likely to wonder what is “real” and what is “imaginative” in Granet’s accounts. That is the whole point of this series of posts—to make sense of the messy world where "real" and "ideal" cohere, and of the work of one of the twentieth centuries most interesting figures.
[1] The passage, was indeed, the first to which I turned when I opened Granet’s La civilisation chinois when writing this section.
[2] In just the past two centuries brotherhoods have
figured prominently in the White Lotus Rebellion (1796-1804), the Taiping
Rebellion (1856-1864), the Boxer Rebellion (1898-1901), and numerous uprisings
between the fall of the Qing dynasty (1911) and the advent of the People’s
Republic of China in 1949.
No comments:
Post a Comment