[a] Dénouement RF |
And, just for the record, regular readers probably already know that I will post the actual lectures not long after they have been given. This week's posts focus on the preparation process, and tackling Allan Bloom's arguments should get your blood pumping. Today's text is the last in a week-long series on Bloom and the core texts that shaped his thinking. It comes from the introduction to Bloom's translation of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's educational and cultural classic, Emile. Today's post has the two-paragraph conclusion (followed by a "note") to Bloom's introductory essay. I could not help but conclude this week-long series on Allan Bloom without giving Bloom the last word.
*** ***
[b] Flower Champs RF |
He didn't see it that way.
The best way to describe Bloom's reaction to such criticism is that he felt he had accomplished both—pummeled the multicultural liberal underbelly and traveled the high road. I would put it a different way. I think that his words in the introductions to his translations of two truly great books—Plato's Republic and Rousseau's Emile—say it all a great deal better. Let's give Bloom a chance to sum it up in the ending to his introductory essay on the Emile. It has all the power that I came to respect in Bloom, even when I didn't agree with him.
Introduction to Rousseau's Emile
Allan Bloom (1979)
[c] Romanticism RF |
Rousseau intends to show that only his understanding of nature and history can adequately describe what man really is and to caution his contemporaries against simplifying and impoverishing the human phenomena. The very unity of man he appears to believe he has demonstrated reveals the problematic character of any solution to man's dividedness. Emile stands somewhere between the citizen of the Social Contract and the solitary of the Reveries, lacking something of each. And this book was the inspiration for both Kant's idealism and Schiller's romanticism, each of which is somehow an elaboration of one aspect of Rousseau's complex teaching. Whatever else Rousseau may have accomplished, he presented the alternatives available to man most comprehensively and profoundly and articulated them in the form which has dominated discussion since his time. We must study him to know ourselves and to discover possibilities his great rhetoric may have overwhelmed.
Note
Emile was published in 1762, almost simultaneously with the Social Contract and two years after the Nouvelle Heloise. Together these three works constitute an exploration of the consequences for modern man of the tensions between nature and civilization, freedom and society, and hence happiness and progress which Rousseau propounded in the Discourse on the Arts and Sciences (1750) and the Discourse on the Origins of Inequality (1754). They each experiment with resolutions of the fundamental human problem, the Social Contract dealing with civil society and the citizen, the Nouvelle Heloise with love, marriage, and the family, and Emile with the education of a naturally whole man who is to live in society. They provide Rousseau's positive statement about the highest possibilities of society and the way to live a good life within it. The major works to which he devoted the rest of his life (Confessions, Dialogues, Dreams of a Solitary Walker) were dedicated to meditation on and presentation to mankind of the profoundest kind of soul, his own, the soul capable of revealing the human situation as he did in his earlier writings.[d] Thinkinvalides RF |
[1] Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Emile [Translated with an introduction by Allan Bloom] (New York: Basic Books, 1979), 28-29.
Bibliography
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Emile [Translated with an introduction by Allan Bloom]. New York: Basic Books, 1979.
No comments:
Post a Comment