From Round to Square (and back)

For The Emperor's Teacher, scroll down (↓) to "Topics." It's the management book that will rock the world (and break the vase, as you will see). Click or paste the following link for a recent profile of the project: http://magazine.beloit.edu/?story_id=240813&issue_id=240610

A new post appears every day at 12:05* (CDT). There's more, though. Take a look at the right-hand side of the page for over four years of material (2,000 posts and growing) from Seinfeld and country music to every single day of the Chinese lunar calendar...translated. Look here ↓ and explore a little. It will take you all the way down the page...from round to square (and back again).
*Occasionally I will leave a long post up for thirty-six hours, and post a shorter entry at noon the next day.

Monday, December 3, 2012

Quotidian Quizzes—Introduction (a)

One year ago on Round and Square (3 December 2011)—Fieldnotes From History: Company, Copamy
[a] Forest...trees RF
This is one part of a multi-post introduction. Click below for the other posts:
Quizzes 1          Quizzes 2          Quizzes 3          Quizzes 4
Quizzes 5          Quizzes 6          Quizzes 7          Quizzes 8
Whoa, cowboy (I hear you cry). You have started Round and Square topics dealing with course syllabuses (look it up) and even assignments. We have hung with you—ridden those intellectual broncos just about as far as we can. We have even read primary sources that really are elementary school texts from Taiwan...twenty-seven years ago. But now you are going to start posting little quizzes? Heck, even the correct spelling of those zzs looks suspect. Quizzes? What are you thinking? You can't be serious (I hear you cry).

Oh, yes, dear cowperson, I am serious. Yes I am.
[b] Quizzes RF

Quizzes. Every day. This is the very definition of the word "quotidian," is it not? And that is the very reality of every course I teach, every day of every term...since 2010. It took a long time to get to that point. You see, I had always thought about quizzes as a peculiarly irritating form of prodding. I saw them, basically, as invasive. I thought that quizzes were meant to catch students not doing their work. They were traps planted by petty little minds who knew nothing about how learning really occurred. They combined all of the flaws of the nineteenth century one-room schoolhouse on the prairie (and none of its advantages) with a mean sort of disposition (and I mean that in at least two senses of the term). I would have been embarrassed even to be associated with something as petty as quizzes.

I was a product of old thinking. And I was wrong.

I was badly in need of a paradigm shift. I had to learn to think in a new way about this whole daily testing thing. Wasn't it intrusive? Wasn't it just the thing that made students nervous and raised the pressure level to the crisis point? Yup, that is exactly what I thought, because that is exactly what quizzes were in my own educational experience, all of the way back to first grade. Quizzes meant supercilious teachers, with their knowing smiles, just waiting for you to fail...right in front of their eyes. Then they would look at you from their haughty little hierarchical perches and feign compassion. "You'll do better next time; just work harder!"
[c] Maze RF

Boy, I hated that.

And for that very personal mnemonic reason, I chose never to give my students quizzes. I thought that it would hurt them, and felt that I would lose credibility in my far more serious pursuit of truly important pedagogical goals. I thought of quizzes as small thinking, and generally worthy of contempt in a school master-ish sort of way. It seemed to me that the best "big-thinking" method would be for students to study, come to class, participate—talking and discussingand engage the materials. Then they would reflect, eventually writing searching and analytical papers that broadened and deepened their educations.

From there, I thought that the syllabus would take care of itself, and that students would make it cohere through the very force of their learning desires (and the class requirements). And I was right. It worked in many ways, and the motivated students thrived. They maneuvered through the challenging syllabus, participated in class, took notes, sometimes wrote them up after class (I love that), and then wrote good papers. 

This was water music to my pedagogical ears. 
[d] Messy RF

It filtered down to about fifty, sixty, or sometimes seventy percent of students in the class. The problem was that the somewhat less motivated ones tanked. It was as though, for them, I had created a free-form school, and they were lost in the open-endedness of it all. Motivate yourself, they seemed to hear, no matter what I thought I was saying. This frustrated me, and made them really quite miserable. I thought about it, went back-and-forth with my plans, plotted out class time, and thought some more. I took long bike rides and pondered the pros and cons of the system I had thought worked quite well. I scratched out notes on paper. I brooded.

Then, back in 2008, I gave my first quiz. Ever.*

Those were the old days, like the early Peanuts cartoons or Simpsons episodes. Those quizzes were just rough sketches, and often a little out-of-proportion. If anything, they were far too easy, since I was paralyzed by the concern that I would ask "unfair" questions. They took up just on side of one page, but even then I had—at the time unbeknownst to me—drawn a deep line in the educational sand. I had no idea, but it slowly seeped in as I started to go through the quizzes, week-after-week, over the course of that first term. I began to see that there were real possibilities with the form. Before that, it had never occurred to me that a quiz question could actually be an intellectual pivot, and that students could start to see the course materials in new ways, even before we had spent a single minute of seminar time discussing what they had read for the week. 
[e] High stakes RF

I saw startlingly positive results from the most motivated students.

I saw something else, though. I noticed that students who might have skipped class to play Frisbee golf or Madden NFL 10 (at the time)...actually began showing up on quiz days. These were Thursdays, the second of two class periods back in the prehistory of my quizzes. A half-dozen or more people might miss class on a Tuesday, no matter what my attendance policy stated about the importance of being in class. Funny thing, though. Thursdays almost always saw a full house. People would risk doing poorly just to get a score on those little tests.

This, too, began to work on my imagination. 

What a combination, I thought. Students actually read the course materials a little more carefully, and I started to see a difference in class discussions. That combined with the phenomenon of everyone showing up to create real excitement in the room as we delved ever more deeply into the material. Then it was back to Tuesday, no quiz, and relative backsliding. I watched this pattern develop over the course of several semesters, and then I made a decision

In the fall of 2010, I went to my current system. I started to give a quiz every single day.

See you tomorrow. At least for my students (it is a Thursday, after all), there will be a quiz.

*Upon reflection, I realize that there was a brief period ten years earlier (FYIers of 1999 and 2000, you will remember this) when I experimented with a minimalist prehistory of quizzes. These were the equivalent of the Paleolithic to the Neolithic 2008 "prehistory" in the account above.

This is one part of a multi-post introduction. Click below for the other posts:
Quizzes 1          Quizzes 2          Quizzes 3          Quizzes 4
Quizzes 5          Quizzes 6          Quizzes 7          Quizzes 8
[f] Goal RF

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Syllabic Cycles (2)—Asian Ethnicities


One year ago on Round and Square (2 December 2011)—Fieldnotes From History: Property Rights
Click here for the introduction to the Round and Square series "Syllabic Cycles"
[a] Asian RF
Asian Ethnicities
History 310 (Anthropology 375)
Autumn 2012 
Tuesdays 7:10-11:00 
Robert André LaFleur                                                   Office Hours 
MI 111                                                                           Tuesday            4:00-5:30
363-2005                                                                       Thursday          4:00-5:30
lafleur@beloit.edu                                                          …or by appointment 

Required Books         
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities.
Appadurai, Arjun. Modernity at Large.
Bhabha, Homi. The Location of Culture.
Brown, Melissa. Is Taiwan Chinese? 
Espiritu, Yen Le. Asian American Panethnicity.
Gladney, Dru. Dislocating China.
Lie, John. Multi-Ethnic Japan.
Mullaney, Thomas. Coming to Terms with the Nation.
Said, Edward. Orientalism.
Shin, Gi-wook. Ethnic Nationalism in Korea.
Spence, Jonathan. Emperor of China.
Walker, Brett. The Conquest of Ainu Lands.
Hacker, Diana. A Pocket Style Manual (required in all history courses)
[b] Examination RF

***  ***
This seminar will examine the idea of “ethnicity” in an Asian (and particularly East Asian) context. East Asia, in particular, has been dominated, until recently, by autocratic regimes that took widely varying approaches to otherness or difference. Our task will be to explore how that dynamic has taken shape in China, Japan, Korea, and other closely connected areas of Asia in the last millennium (or three). Students will focus on a cluster of ethic groups in a part of East Asia, and spread their interests north, south, east, and west, as archival duty calls. Above all, we will not be starting from the comfortable “fifty-six ethnic groups” argument of the People’s Republic of China or other arguments in Japan, Taiwan (the Republic of China), Korea, or elsewhere. We will study the ethnic dynamics in (East) Asia during the last three thousand years, and try to understand how it affects the twenty-first century world. 

Evaluation

Weekly Quizzes/Logs (15)                                         15%
Weekly Reports                                                          35%
Seminar Paper                                                           50% 
Class attendance and participation is expected.  More than one absence will significantly affect your grade.  Late assignments will be penalized.  
 _______________________________________________________

History 310 & Anthropology 375
Asian Ethnicities
Autumn 2012 

Week I (August 28) 
Jonathan Spence, Emperor of China 
     Acknowledgments
     K’ang-hsi’s Reign
     In Motion
     Ruling
     Thinking
     Growing Old
     Sons
     Valedictory
     Appendix A. Seventeen Letters to Ku Wen-hsing, Chief Eunuch, Spring 1697
     Appendix B. The “Final” Valedictory Edict

Week II (September 4)  
Anderson, Imagined Communities
     Introduction
     Cultural Roots
     The Origins of National Consciousness
     Creole Pioneers
     Old Languages, New Models
     Official Nationalism and Imperialism
     The Last Wave
     Patriotism and Racism
     The Angel of History
     Census, Map, Museum
     Memory and Forgetting
     Travel and Traffic: On the Geo-biography of Imagined Communities
Week III (September 11)                 
Said, Orientalism
Introduction
The Scope of Orientalism
Knowing the Oriental
Imaginative Geography and Its Representations
Projects
Crisis
Orientalist Structures and Restructures
Redrawn Frontiers, Redefined Issues, Secularized Religion
Silvestre de Sacy and Ernest Renan: Rational Anthropology and...
Oriental Residence and Scholarship: The Requirements of Lexicography...
Pilgrims and Pilgrimages, British and French
Orientalism Now
            Latent and Manifest Orientalism
            Style, Expertisse, Vision: Orientalism’s Worldliness
            Modern Anglo-French Orientalism in Fullest Flower
            The Latest Phase
            Afterword

Week IV (September 18)
Bhabha, The Location of Culture
     Introduction: Locations of Culture
     The Commitment to Theory
     Interrogating Identity: Frantz Fanon and the Postcolonial Perogative
     The Other Question: Stereotype, Discrimination, and the Discourse of Colonialism
     Of Mimicry and Man: The Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse
     Sly Civility
     Signs Taken for Wonders: Questions of Ambivalence and Authority...
     DissemiNation: Time, Narrative, and the Margins of the Modern Nation
     The Postcolonial and the Postmodern: The Question of Agency
     By Bread Alone: Signs of Violence in the Mid-Nineteenth Century
     How Newness Enters the World: Postmodern Space, Postcolonial Times…
     Trials of      Cultural Translation
     Conclusion: ‘Race’, Time and the Revision of Modernity

Week V (September 25) 
Appadurai,  Modernity at Large
     Here and Now
            Part I Global Flows
               Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy
               Global Ethnoscapes: Notes and Queries for a Transnational Anthropology
               Consumption, Duration, and History
            Part II Modern Colonies
                Playing with Modernity: The Decolonization of Indian Cricket
                Number in the Colonial Imagination
            Part III Postnational Locations
               Life after Primordialism
               Patriotism and Its Futures
[d] Categorized RF
               The Production of Locality

Week VI (October 2)     
Mullaney, Coming to Terms with the Nation
Introduction
Identity Crisis in Postimperial China
Ethnicity as Language
Plausible Communities
The Consent of the Categorized
Counting to Fifty-Six
Conclusion: A History of the Future

Week VII (October 9)
Gladney, Dislocating China
     Introduction: Locating and Dislocating Culture in Contemporary China
            Part I  RECOGNITIONS
               Cultural Nationalisms in Contemporary China
               Mapping the Chinese Nation
            Part II  REPRESENTATIONS
               Making, Marking, and Marketing Identity
               Film and Forecasting the Nation
            Part III  FOLKLORIZATIONS
               Enmeshed Civilizations
               Localization and Transnational Pilgrimages
            Part IV  ETHNICIZATIONS
               Dialogic Identities
               Relational Alterities
            Part V  INDIGENIZATIONS
               Ethnogenesis or Ethnogenocide?
               Cyber-Separatism
            Part VI  SOCIALIZATIONS
               Educating China’s Others
               Subaltern Perspectives on Prosperity
            Part VII  POLITICIZATIONS
               Gulf Wars and Displaced Persons
               Bodily Positions, Social Dispositions
     Conclusions

Week VIII—Autumn Break
Week IX (October 23)
Lie, Multiethnic Japan
Introduction
The Second Opening of Japan
The Contemporary Discourse of Japaneseness
Pop Multiethnicity
Modern Japan, Multiethnic Japan
Geneaologies of Japanese Identity and Monoethnic Ideology
Classify and Signify
Conclusion
Summary Review of your Review Essay Project Due by   
 5:00 p.m. on Monday, October 29

Week X (October 30)      
Shin, Ethnic Nationalism in Kore
            PART I   ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT
               Pan-Asianism and Nationalism
               Colonial Racism and Nationalism
               International Socialism and Nationalism
               North Korea and “Socialism of Our Style”
               Ilmin Chuui and “Modernization of the Fatherland”
            PART II  CONTENTIOUS POLITICS
                Universalism and Particularism in Nation Building
                Tradition, Modernity, and Nation
                Division and Politics of National Representation
                Nation, History, and Politics
            PART III  CURRENT MANIFESTATIONS
                Ethnic Identity and National Unification
                Between Nationalism and Globalization
     Conclusion: Genealogy, Legacy, and Future

Week XI  (November 6)
Brown, Is Taiwan Chinese?
     What’s in a Name? Culture, Identity, and the “Taiwan Problem”
     Where Did the Aborigines Go? Reinstating Plains Aborigines in Taiwan’s History
     “We Savages Didn’t Bind Feet”: Culture, Colonial Intervention, and...
     “Having a Wife is Better than Having a God”:Ancestry, Governmental…
     “They Came With Their Hands Tied Behind Their Backs”: Forced Migration...
     Theory and the Politics of Reunification: Understanding Past Choices and Future Options
Week XII (November 13)
Walker, The Conquest of Ainu Lands
The Consolidation of the Early-Modern Japanese State in the North
Shakushain’s War
The Ecology of Ainu Autonomy and Dependence
Symbolism and Environment in Trade
The Sakhalin Trade: Diplomatic and Ecological Balance
The Kuril Trade: Russia and the Question of Boundaries
Epidemic Disease, Medicine, and the Shifting Ecology of Ezo
The Role of Ceremony in Conquest

Week XIII (November 20)
Espiritu, Asian American Panethnicity
     Ethnicity and Panethnicity
     Coming Together: The Asian American Movement
     Electoral Politics
     The Politics of Social Service Funding
     Census Classification: The Politics of Ethnic Enumeration
     Reactive Solidarity: Anti-Asian Violence
     Pan-Asian American Ethnicity: Retrospect and Prospect
3,000-word “Lead” for Review Articles Due by 5:00 p.m. 
on Sunday, November 27

Week XIV  (November 27)     
TBA (Handout)

Week XV (December 4)
TBA (Handout)

All late work (other than final essay) due by Friday, December 7 at 10:00 p.m.
Final Projects Due on Tuesday, December 18 by 5:00 p.m.

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Assignments (4c)—Writing From Primary and Secondary Sources

One year ago on Round and Square (1 December 2011)—Fieldnotes From History: Copying
Click here for the introduction to the Round and Square series "Assignments"
[a] Icon RF
Japanese History and Culture
History 210—Anthropology 275
Final Paper Assignment
Writing From Primary and Secondary Sources 

This assignment is broken into three posts. Click below for the others:
Sources 1               Sources 2               Sources 3
Reading the Sources
This assignment is for a source analysis paper, not a traditional persuasive essay.  It is meant to give you a hands-on experience in working with historical sources.  It is “artificial” in the sense that you will not be working in an archive, but it is no less serious for that.  My best advice is for you to make separate copies (this may cost a few dollars, but will be worth it) of each of the readings you choose.  Yes, that means I am encouraging you to go to a copy machine (or a scanner) and make a copy of the poem in McCullough (or the text in Lu) with which you plan to work.  It also means that you should make a copy of the fifteen-page section in Japan in Print that you have selected (these are, of course, just examples).
[b] Volk RF

When you have finished your scanning (then printing) or your copying, you will have a bundle of texts in front of you—an artificial and miniature archive.  Now is the time to go back through them, underlining and marking key points that will help you to form an argument.  This is different from reading in preparation for class, when you should be trying to understand the documents in the wider context of our class discussions.  You will now be reading them to help you construct an argument about a theme in Japanese history and culture.  As you make your notes on the individual texts (some primary, some secondary), it helps to have a blank sheet close by, on which you can start to sketch an outline for the developing argument.

Writing the Paper
Audience, audience, audience.  As you begin to write your paper, have a clear audience in mind.  Think of your essay as a way of both arguing a point and patiently explaining the historical and cultural themes that the texts raise.  The best way to maintain the correct perspective on audience is to imagine a small group of Beloit College professors who know little about Japan (imagine Steve Wright, Nancy McDowell, Tom McBride, Pablo Torals, and Linda Sturtz).  They are all very intelligent, and know how to construct a superior argument.  They need you to teach them about Japan.  To the extent that you remember this, you will excel; to the extent that you fall into the habit of writing just for your professor, you will err.  Remember this.
[c] History funtime RF

Your paper should lead the readers through the texts and through an argument about Japanese history and culture.  Let us take the following example.  You choose to write a paper about women and marriage in Japan, selecting an array of sources that includes The Pillow Book of Sei Shonagan, The Confessions of Lady Nijo and several poems from Lu.  You also choose a passage each from the books by Hanley and Keene (secondary sources of, say, ten pages each dealing with various issues relevant to your paper).  You read the texts carefully, and, as you begin writing your paper, you maintain a balance between explaining the genres and cultural frameworks of your texts and making your key point (your thesis).  

 The thesis remains important.  Let us say that your thesis is that women had significant room for creative social and even literary action (agency) within the traditional patriarchal household, and that the Western “narrative” about women’s life in Japan treats them (mistakenly) as merely passive figures—pawns among powerful men.  If you were writing a traditional paper, you would state that clearly in the first few paragraphs and then find texts to support your point.  It is an important skill to develop, and an ability to frame a thesis will help in this assignment.
[d] Context RF

A source analysis paper is different, though.  Let us say that your thesis statement is the same as above (women have “agency”).  Your paper will develop slightly differently as you make your argument.  You will give a great deal of context from your sources.  Indeed, your sources will figure far more richly in your paper than in most traditional persuasive essays.  You will spend time showing, for example, how Lady Nijo’s comments on her cloistered life “work” as a narrative form—how she proceeds in a contrapuntal manner that gives context to her pathos.   

You will break down the verbal (and possibly even rhyme) schemes of the poems you analyze.  You will, in short, open the world of the texts to your readers as little worlds unto themselves.  This kind of paper argues a context and teaches cultural context. Your mission will be both persuasive and illustrative.  You will persuade through your argument about female “agency;” you will illustrate (and instruct) by placing your texts in an interpretive universe that helps your readers—who don’t know Japanese culture well—see how the argument fits Japanese culture.

This kind of paper can be a joy to write, at least once you develop familiarity with it.  It is a necessary skill, too, because writing for audiences unfamiliar with your topic is central to academic life.  The source analysis paper encourages you to take the persuasive essay form you learned in junior high school and high school and give it the kind of cultural and historical nuance that we have developed in our class discussions.  You might want to think of your explanations of how the sources “work” as a kind of “thickening” of your argument.  We will discuss this in class, but the key ideas to remember are: sources, audience, argument, and context.

This assignment is broken into three posts. Click below for the others:
Sources 1               Sources 2               Sources 3
[e] Audience + Sources + Ideas + Argument = Asia RF