From Round to Square (and back)

For The Emperor's Teacher, scroll down (↓) to "Topics." It's the management book that will rock the world (and break the vase, as you will see). Click or paste the following link for a recent profile of the project: http://magazine.beloit.edu/?story_id=240813&issue_id=240610

A new post appears every day at 12:05* (CDT). There's more, though. Take a look at the right-hand side of the page for over four years of material (2,000 posts and growing) from Seinfeld and country music to every single day of the Chinese lunar calendar...translated. Look here ↓ and explore a little. It will take you all the way down the page...from round to square (and back again).
*Occasionally I will leave a long post up for thirty-six hours, and post a shorter entry at noon the next day.

Monday, December 10, 2012

Quotidian Quizzes—Introduction (h)

A year ago on Round and Square (10 December 2011)—Beginnings: Aspects of the Novel
[a] Everything RF
This is one part of a multi-post introduction. Click below for the other posts:
Quizzes 1          Quizzes 2          Quizzes 3          Quizzes 4
Quizzes 5          Quizzes 6          Quizzes 7          Quizzes 8

So there you have it. Quizzes help with everything from attendance to memorization of key materials, and have the added benefit of leading students toward the most important, and nuanced, facets of the historiographical operation. They are so useful that I have only one more thing to say. This is important, so stay with me for just a few more paragraphs. 
[b] Learning RF

It's not just for historians.

Yes, my examples in the last half-dozen (or so) posts have come from Japanese history. I am assuming that not many readers failed to see the possibilities beyond Japan...and history.

You see, the great part is that it works with everything.

Historiography is just the opening volley in a long string of terrific benefits that can be found by doing one's reading, coming to class, and learning to think more deeply about the nature of academic argument

Ethnographies, for example, work in this manner. Our very same Jimbo would initially be perplexed by two anthropologists who seemed to come at questions of festival activity in New Guinea in such weirdly different ways that he might wonder if they were even talking about the same Guinea. Using a bit of ethnographic telescoping, we might have, on the one hand, a careful study of the caloric power of yams and pork along with, on the other hand, a moment-by-moment narration and analysis of ceremonies meant to make people cry and try to light the people who made them sad...on fire.*
*The ethnographies are Roy Rappaport's Pigs for the Ancestors and Edward Schieffelin's The Sorrow of the Lonely and the Burning of the Dancers.

The professor might well ask Jimbo the same kind of question s/he did with regard to the individual who was emperor of Japan during much of the twentieth century. And Jimbo might reply with an audible "huh?"  

But only at first. 
[c] Everything RF

As Jimbo learns to get better and better at interpreting the scholarly opinions of others (this comes from, as we have seen, understanding that—at least on one level—all scholars are just a variant of Packer and Bears fans), he comes to see that the anthropologist who counts calories and the one who narrates "emotion-ritual" are all involved in an enterprise that seeks to understand the ever-changing dimensions of human life and thought. That's all. 

He starts to understand that ethnographies and histories...have authors. People write them.

From there, it is just a short series of steps until we understand that even biology papers, economic tracts, and psychological studies are also authored. That might be a step too far for our quizzes right now, though. You see, in those cases, even a few of the professors in these fields are not quite on-board with the concept of authorship. Let's just leave them alone for now, and let them imagine that their ideas end up in journals from the hands of the gods, the wings of doves, the ethers of the laboratory, and a little bit of typing.* 
*It goes without saying that Beloit College professors are much more enlightened than this.  

We know better, and have the foundations for tackling those questions, now and in the future, from the quizzical and daily work we do in the Round and Square series:
                                          ↓
                           Quotidian Quizzes. 

Welcome. 


This is one part of a multi-post introduction. Click below for the other posts:
Quizzes 1          Quizzes 2          Quizzes 3          Quizzes 4
Quizzes 5          Quizzes 6          Quizzes 7          Quizzes 8
[d] On high RF


 

2 comments:

  1. This was all certainly fun to read through. The critique of pure reason is definitely a book I will be looking into. I when you mentioned the discussion post modernism I was kinda lost, but I assume that it was this event which brought along the idea of "authorship" and its critics were the ones who didn't like the idea that the old societal biases that had governed the profession for a good long while were being challenged(buts thats probably MY bias showing). The jimbo scenarios really hit the nail in the coffin, especailly because at one point I was jimbo, only I didn't get my love of history from school but (rather ironically) from youtube channels like Alternate History Hub or Extra History(this one is a way better model for historiography). I like to think that I was able to ease into the "authourship" approach to history easily because of these channels, as the authorship and bias was much more clearer to see than in a textbook. Due to the nature of the comment section(and youtube itself) if a creator made a piece of content that someone felt was biased or didn't do it well enough, there was sure to be a rebuttal in the comment section or in a separate video all together. And a lot of these rebuttals were REALLY good and well researched(at least on the historical/academic side-the ones I watched that is). As for disagreements, I think the part about video games being the bane of scholarly learning is a bit dated, but I see your point. Sometimes a incentive is needed for kids to get their butts in seats.

    I apologize for the small essay in your blog, but your posts really got me thinking about things- and I noticed that you have responded to comments in the previous posts, so I though I might give this a shot.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent, Diego. I really appreciate the detailed reflection, and I am impressed with the way that you avoided the Jimbo situation in your own life. I'll take a look at the "video games" reference. The essay was written ten years ago, so some things like that may not age well. Great stuff. I like what you say (and, yes, Kant's Critique of Pure Reason is the opening for another entire line of thinking, with many other works that refine and refute).

    ReplyDelete