On this date on Round and Square's History
30 August 2015—China's Lunar Calendar 2015 08-30
30 August 2015—Zweirad Szenen: Where Fish Sleep
30 August 2014—China's Lunar Calendar 2014 08-30
30 August 2014—Social and Cultural Theory: Theory Letter (2014)
30 August 2013—China's Lunar Calendar 2013 08-30
30 August 2013—New York Review of Books Syllabus (2013)
30 August 2012—The New Yorker and the World: Course Introduction
30 August 2011—Styling Culture: Introduction
30 August 2015—China's Lunar Calendar 2015 08-30
30 August 2015—Zweirad Szenen: Where Fish Sleep
30 August 2014—China's Lunar Calendar 2014 08-30
30 August 2014—Social and Cultural Theory: Theory Letter (2014)
30 August 2013—China's Lunar Calendar 2013 08-30
30 August 2013—New York Review of Books Syllabus (2013)
30 August 2012—The New Yorker and the World: Course Introduction
30 August 2011—Styling Culture: Introduction
[a] Text and illustration RF |
History 310
Autumn 2016
Preliminary Writing Assignment
History, Theory, Text: The Letter
By choosing the letter format for your first writing assignment, I am asking you to build upon the skills you have already begun to develop in analyzing (and providing examples for) theoretical constructions and key elements of Confucius's Analects. You have already reached a point where you have some experience with “social theory” and "Confucius. Your job now will be to explain it to an intelligent non-specialist.
Teach it, really (think of the New York Review).
[b] Reaching, teaching RF |
Teach it, really (think of the New York Review).
Letters from “the field” (or our modified “archive” of theoretical works on the syllabus) are a good way to refine your thoughts about ethnographic and historical study, and they are a useful medium for beginning the intellectual “framing process” that will accelerate as we move through the next two-thirds of the course. The letter writing exercise is especially useful while studying theoretical source materials, such as those in our seminar.
The nonfiction writer John McPhee explains to his Princeton students that a letter is often precisely the solution to problems of interpretation or clarity—when in doubt, write to mother, he says. In this case, it is not a plea of “send money” that the letter contains, but a reworking, rethinking, and contextualization of your work. You need not limit yourself to kinfolk, but you need to think about who the recipient will be (ideally someone who will welcome a letter about “doing theory”).
You owe it to yourself to listen to this long interview with McPhee. At the very least, listen to the first few minutes. It is the very purpose behind this assignment.
The nonfiction writer John McPhee explains to his Princeton students that a letter is often precisely the solution to problems of interpretation or clarity—when in doubt, write to mother, he says. In this case, it is not a plea of “send money” that the letter contains, but a reworking, rethinking, and contextualization of your work. You need not limit yourself to kinfolk, but you need to think about who the recipient will be (ideally someone who will welcome a letter about “doing theory”).
You owe it to yourself to listen to this long interview with McPhee. At the very least, listen to the first few minutes. It is the very purpose behind this assignment.
Now start writing. Toward that end, you should pay attention to the following issues.
1. The letter needs to be “long enough” to get you deeply into several issues regarding Confucius and social theory, including particular approaches and a few examples. There is no absolute upper limit, but I am going to make an absolute lower limit of 1,000 words (about three pages). Realistically, your letter should probably be somewhere in the 1,500 word range (about five pages). 1,000 words is the bare minimum. Do not turn in an assignment shorter than that.
2. I am asking you to connect with a very specific reader, and to explain “Confucius and social theory” in a level of detail that she will find satisfying. You are the expert, and your “audience” is the person who will be reading your letter (think of my role as reading over her shoulder). I have found that this kind of assignment helps students to explain even abstruse matters, because the personal relationship they have with their readers demands an attention to patient explanation that is often lacking in more “academic” forms of writing, in which they assume that a professor already knows what they are writing about.
Your reader probably doesn't.
Make it make sense.
Your reader probably doesn't.
Make it make sense.
3. You may approach your materials from any angle that you like, but you will need to “cover” at least the following items, no matter what order you choose.
a. You must discuss the “what is social theory?” or "what is a 'sociological
imagination'" question at the heart of our course. Provide your reader with
at least a few ways of thinking about it.
imagination'" question at the heart of our course. Provide your reader with
at least a few ways of thinking about it.
b. Give your reader a sense of what you have learned up to this point about
Confucius and the Analects. Use examples from your studies thus far.
c. Finally, give your reader some sense of what it is like to “learn theory” while
thinking about a classic text from China. What is it like? Explain.
d. You must have at least one illustration. Think about "the rhetorical role of
illustrations" in the New York Review of Books.
4. The best way to approach the writing process is in three parts (this is a friendly suggestion). First, jot down some notes for each of the “sections” of your letter. Second, using those notes as a guide, write a rough draft of the whole letter. Third, revise, polish, and refine.
Voilà you will have something not unlike what Alexis de Tocqueville might have written about understanding a complex, foreign culture that baffled and enticed him 180 years ago. While your letter won’t be as long as Democracy in America, it is likely—if it is done well—to be much like Tocqueville’s rich and evocative letters back to his family about encountering people, texts, and institutions in a strange land called the United States.
You get the idea. If you don't, just raise your hand and ask me (or send me an e-mail message). I'll be happy to help.
Voilà you will have something not unlike what Alexis de Tocqueville might have written about understanding a complex, foreign culture that baffled and enticed him 180 years ago. While your letter won’t be as long as Democracy in America, it is likely—if it is done well—to be much like Tocqueville’s rich and evocative letters back to his family about encountering people, texts, and institutions in a strange land called the United States.
You get the idea. If you don't, just raise your hand and ask me (or send me an e-mail message). I'll be happy to help.
*** ***
Letters are Due (as .pdf files—attach to an e-mail to lafleur@beloit.edu)
by 5:00 p.m. on Sunday, September 18.
[e] And then you may rest RF |