From Round to Square (and back)

For The Emperor's Teacher, scroll down (↓) to "Topics." It's the management book that will rock the world (and break the vase, as you will see). Click or paste the following link for a recent profile of the project: http://magazine.beloit.edu/?story_id=240813&issue_id=240610

A new post appears every day at 12:05* (CDT). There's more, though. Take a look at the right-hand side of the page for over four years of material (2,000 posts and growing) from Seinfeld and country music to every single day of the Chinese lunar calendar...translated. Look here ↓ and explore a little. It will take you all the way down the page...from round to square (and back again).
*Occasionally I will leave a long post up for thirty-six hours, and post a shorter entry at noon the next day.
Showing posts with label Hank Williams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hank Williams. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Erlangen 91052 (12)—Everyday Words: Tchüß!

Click here for the introduction to the Round and Square Series "Erlangen 91052"
Click here for the "Erlangen 91052" Resource Center—All Posts Available 
One year ago on Round and  Square (9 April 2013)—China's Lunar Calendar 2013 04-09
Two years ago on Round and Square (9 April 2012)—La Pensée Chinoise: Primitive Classification
Three years ago on Round and Square (9 April 2011)—Exilic Response: Introduction
[a] The end (for now) RF
I had to make a little trip yesterday to the customs center in the little village of Tennenlohe, positioned between Erlangen (91052) and Nuremberg. A package was waiting for me, and it contained a bunch of old books that I purchased in the 1980s and 1990s. I was told that in the "old days," just a few years ago, I could have sent approval for them to open the box; they would then send it on to me at my office. No more. Now I have to take the Stadtbus 295 to Tennenlohe Frauenweiherstraße...thirty minutes through woodlands and outskirts before finally arriving in the middle of what looks like a parking lot. Could this be right?

Yup.
[b] See ya! RF

I walked into a nondescript building that made no mention of Deutsche Post, and just had a small four letters—Zoll (in this instance, "customs." I knew this was right, but the place did not seem particularly welcoming. I walked through the doors, went to the wrong window, was pointed to the correct office, and arrived to find a big, young, burly, Germanic guy with one of the warmest smiles I can remember. I handed him the letter that "he" had sent me. He set that one aside and picked up the next page—the customs slip that my wife had filled out when she sent me the books. That was what he needed. All seemed to be going well as he retrieved the box and set it in front of me.

"Invoice?"

"Huh? I bought the books twenty years ago. I don't have the receipts anymore."

"Invoice?"

"As I said, these are old books. They are from my office." This went on for some time before I blurted the following: "My wife put them into the box and mailed them to me from Virginia." "Oh!"...and everything was o.k. It turned out that she wasn't a used books seller, and all was well. "Open the box and show me the contents." Done; done. "Tape it back up; you are finished."
[c] Partin' Machine RF

I taped the box, nodded kindly to the now-stern-now-warm big-guy, and prepared to leave the office with my haul of academic platinum. As I neared the portal and prepared to disappear into the hallway, I heard one of the most familiar words in Germany today (it has been so for several decades). 

Tschüß!

I turned around and repeated tschuß!, and we parted as happy customs-companions.
***  ***
So, if you thought that this post would be about packaging, shipping, and customs-customs, you would be mistaken (like a Simpsons episode, we start with a twist). It is rather about the big, burly, bubba-guy who seemingly changed personality when it was time to bid adieu.

That's the story of my life here in Erlangen 91052. 

"Goodbyes" matter, and for serious social-theoretical reasons that will help us conclude this essay. For now, just know that if you gained your linguistic knowledge of goodbye! from The Lawrence Welk Show's channeling of the von Trapp family singers, you will have big problems here in Erlangen 91052 in 2014. 

[d] Tschuß! RF

I will not speak (now) to the other languages, but let's just get this clear. The auf wiedersehen that you hear from the cherubic singers on the Lawrence Welk Show...never gets said here. Oh, I exaggerate you say? Come spend a week with me. I dare you to "hear it." But isn't that what Blickpunkt Deutschland "said" I should "say" in high school German? I'm pretty sure that's what "they said."

Nope, now it's tschüß!, and this didn't happen just yesterday. I first encountered the phrase in a cassette tape series I checked out of the Madison Public Library in 1998, so I am not claiming that it is "new." On the other hand, I do know that my high school and college German in the late-1970s and early-1980s never had tschuß! in them. You don't believe me? I am looking right now at my soiled copy of German in Review right now—one of the books that was in the precious package I received just yesterday. Nope, nein, nichts.

Tschüß! doesn't appear in there once. Not even once.

So what happened?

Well, that will require a follow up post, and a little bit of fieldwork (look for it in late-March). For now, however, I want to emphasize the ubiquity of the term. I use it in parting at Kaufland, at my local tobacco store (where I buy my weekly copy of Die Zeit, not tobacco), after a brief conversation on the bus, when I leave my favorite zaiten sushi restaurant, and almost every day when I lock my office door at what we call the IKGF (Internationales Kolleg für Geisteswissenschaftliche Forschung), and speak my parting words to colleagues before walking the two pastoral blocks back to my apartment on Carl Thiersch Straße in Erlangen 91052.
[e] Headin' Out RF

Tschüß!

And that is why I find this little "bye-bye" so interesting. It is fascinating in a(n) historical sense, of course, and our follow-up post will investigate what people have to say about the "development" of the term in the last thirty years. This is not your...Lawrence Welk's...Germany anymore. That is for a later day, though.

For now, let's consider what I think is really most interesting about this little parting ejaculation. It's one of the most florid words in all of social theory (not to mention country music). Goodbye isn't just "language." It certainly isn't a tiny little final aside in the back-and-forth of purchasing, question-asking, or conversing in a dynamic social dyad. It is the very moment when the teeming vivacity of dialogue (or more) makes the cut-off toward parting—toward severing the social dynamic. 

The sound of goodbye.

And "parting" is such an indispensable part of social interaction that we need to focus our gaze keenly in that direction. Do we do this often enough? No, we don't. We tend to see the "meat" (or "meet") of the interaction in terms of what is happening in it. Unless we spend a lot of time listening to Patty Loveless or Hank Williams, we are most likely to think about the middle of the interaction. I am saying that we need to focus on the end—on how we say (in words and actions and gestures) "goodbye."
[f] Ending RF

The "sense of an ending" has everything to do with how people associate. You can't spell "meeting" without "time"...ing, and (aside from introductions, which we will consider later), nothing packs a mnemonic, historical, and emotional punch like the sound of goodbye. And let's not even kid ourselves. Auf wiedersehen (see you again!) does not compress phonemes and letters into as evocative an utterance as tschüß!

Think about it, and we'll return to this topic next week (I can't let it go, and because it is probably in a punch-match with genau for the most common word in German social life. People have opinions about it, and (as we will see on Tuesday), there is a varied world between danke...tschüß! and schöne abend...tschüß!...and auf widersehen.

Are they subtle? No, not really. They're all about goodbye.

Pierre Bourdieu will help us as we expand our parting struggles next week. 

We will consider history, culture, fieldwork, archives...and everyday experiences in Erlangen 91052.

NEXT
Tuesday, 4 March 2014
Erlangen 91052 (13)—Everyday Words: Tschüß! (b)
The word has a history, and it will take historical (and ethnographic) inquiry to begin to understand it. 

[g] Auf Wiedersehen! RF

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Hurtin', Leavin', and Longin' (51)—The Show Hank Never Gave

A year ago on Round and Square (1 January 2012)—Hurtin' Country: My Home's in Alabama
Click here for the introduction to the Round and Square series "Hurtin', Leavin', and Longin,"
[a] Perspective (RF)
There it was. Canton, Ohio. January 1, 1953—sixty years ago to the day. 

Hank Williams was the lead act in two big shows scheduled for that Thursday afternoon and evening. Michigan State was set to play UCLA in the Rose Bowl, but the biggest event in pre-television Canton was a tall, skinny guy who even then was known as Old Hank. He was twenty-nine years old, and the biggest star in Nashville. Quite arguably, no one matched him anywhere in the whole of the United States, and he was popular overseas as well. The Canton shows had been talked about for weeks. They were sold out.  

And they never happened.

Hank never showed.

Hours earlier, Hank lay dead in the back seat of a big '52 Cadillac, having succumbed to liquor, pills, and (some have argued) heartache. His life was a little like a college dormitory sofa. Unnoticed for much of the time, it gets moved to center stage (usually an abandoned lot for the sofa) and a big audience. Then it lights up the night and burns an impossibly brilliant flame before sputtering out just as quickly...and forever.

This is how I think of it. My father approached it somewhat differently when he told me Hank stories while I was growing up. Dad had listened to all of Hank's 45s as he made his youthful way around Mayville, North Dakota in the late-1940s and early-1950s. Hank wasn't "country," he told me. Hank was music. Dad told of radio shows with Hank's folksy chatter, and even late night rebroadcasts of the Grand Ole Opry on WSM (50,000 watts of nighttime power) that could make it up the Red River beyond Fargo, and almost to Winnipeg. 

He ended with a cautionary note. "Son," he said seriously (this is how I remember it now), "it isn't easy to drink yourself to death at the age of twenty-nine." He went on to explain that abuse that serious took hard work, and more than a little cognitive turmoil. I forgot the overall point (something about leading a life of relative moderation, I think), so entranced was I by the idea of a legend burning out before thirty.
[c] Career RF

Years later, reading a biography of Hank Williams in advance of an interdisciplinary seminar on country music and East Asian poetry (this really happened), I chanced upon a line that has stayed with me as powerfully as dad's observation about hard drinking. Colin Escott observed, if I recall correctly, that for months during 1952 Hank Williams had missed shows, showed up drunk, and generally been a pretty undependable figure in a world that needed punctuality and organization. DJs and booking agents were losing interest, and Hank's career was threatened with a downward spiral. Then it all changed, and Hank's reputation skyrocketed, blazing even brighter than before...lasting for all of the next sixty years.

"Sometimes," Escott noted, "death is a good career move."
[d] Sinology RF

It was for Hank Williams, unpleasant though the full implications of that thought might be. You see, Hank could still be with us had things turned out a little differently. He could be eighty-nine years old, and revered by generations of country artists in the way that Bill Monroe, Johnny Cash, Ernest Tubb, and others have been (he would be a lot more interesting than his kid, that's for sure). I sometimes imagine Hank, sitting in a rocking chair, explaining success on the stage. Word has it that he would do all sorts of fascinating musical things when working with his band in a relaxed setting. When they got on stage, though, he was all (show) business. 

"Just give 'em vanilla, boys," he cautioned. And off they went.
***  ***
In Chinese cosmology and historiography, there is a way of counting that marks the years in an ever-repeating cycle of sixty. Over the millennia, observers have sometimes remarked that every sixtieth year is similar, and a sinologist once remarked that we should translate a major work of scholarship in 1994, precisely because it was originally published in 1934, and "it would be like no time has passed at all." 

I am thinking about Hank Williams that way today. It was sixty years ago....exactly. It is as though time never passed.

[e] Hank RF

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Hurtin', Leavin' and Longin' (46)—Good Ole Boys

[a] Memory RF
We are going to look at longin' today. We are staying with the wistful strands of that overall theme for another week, and this song is all about relationships—just not the kinds you might have come to expect among the generally painful themes of this series. The lyrics here are deep, tender, and resonant—wrapped into a bundle of memory. If the term "good ole boy" has a particular kind of red-state, pickup-drivin', beer swillin', shotgun packin' imagery for you...well, you've come to the wrong place. You won't find any pickup testicles here. Not a one.

[b] Immediate RF
Bob McDill and Don Williams are here to mess with easy preconceptions of what we now think of as territories of red and blue. Bob and Don are not, to be sure, urban liberals pretending to know what "country" is all about (that would be a good description of most country radio these days, and it is why most of it is no better than swill).

No, you'll see thick nuggets of southern life sprouting up throughout these lyrics. What separates this song from your average "country identity" ode is its immediacy. There are real chunks of autobiography here, and for every Stonewall Jackson image you will see, further down the lyrical road, a Thomas Wolfe reference. This is as close to autobiographical realism as it gets in country music. Dirt-kickin' mimesis, as it were.

Take a listen, and leave your preconceptions at the salo(o)n door. Either kind of either kind. If you're packing Fox News or MSNBC firepower, take them out of the holsters and leave them on the table (yup, that little ideological featherweight near your left ankle, too, mobster-boy). You'll get a claim check to pick them up on your way out. No spin here. Just listen...and read.


Good Ole Boys Like Me
Songwriter: Bob McDill
Artist: Don Williams
When I was a kid Uncle Remus he put me to bed
With a picture of Stonewall Jackson above my head
Then daddy came in to kiss his little man
With gin on his breath and a Bible in his hand
He talked about honor and things I should know
Then he'd stagger a little as he went out the door

CHORUS
I can still hear the soft Southern winds in the live
oak trees
And those Williams boys they still mean a lot to me
Hank and Tennessee
I guess we're all gonna be what we're gonna be
So what do you do with good ole boys like me?

Nothing makes a sound in the night like the wind does

But you ain't afraid if you're washed in the blood like I was
The smell of cape jasmine through the window screen
John R. and the Wolfman kept me company
By the light of the radio by my bed
With Thomas Wolfe whispering in my head

Chorus

When I was in school I ran with a kid down the street

But I watched him burn himself up on bourbon and speed
But I was smarter than most and I could choose
Learned to talk like the man on the six o'clock news
When I was eighteen, Lord, I hit the road
But it really doesn't matter how far I go

Chorus

[c] Past wince RF
What do you do with good ole boys like that? It's as though Mr. Williams is saying "take that and put it in your preconception pipe and smoke it." Uncle Remus and Stonewall Jackson are likely to have made knees jerk all over the countryside. Mine too; I think my knee knocked over the table. Back in 1982, when I first heard the song, I scoffed at the first verses and didn't take it seriously again until a decade later (when I finally "got it"). Mix in a little "washed in the blood," and we can tuck this little ditty right into our stereotype files, can't we?

But then, if the lyrics in the first verse seem problematic, why do we keep listening, just like I did thirty years ago? I listened back then, but I didn't hear. Still, something stuck. Bob McDill's lyrics are haunting; Don Williams and his velvety voice hung with me like a magnetic field. And if we do (finally) keep listening, the story gets a little bit more complicated—more layered and textured with every line.

It's a real life, told in a particular cultural form (the "memory song") over several scenes, and in just four minutes (with chorus).

[d] Rural (WPA) RF
I would take issue with anyone who can simply peg this song as back country-hokum, as many sophisticates do with all "country" music. On the other hand, don't be too hard on yourself if you don't understand what's the matter with Kansas or how one could go (sort of) deer hunting with Jesus. You might find it interesting that even the songwriter, Bob McDill, would not have written this song when he first started out in Nashville. Back then, he wrote what he thought was "country" music, and failed. He came to understand that the failure lay in running from his origins and from the genre.

Driving along the lonesome road one day (this is how I imagine it)—a complete failure in the songwriting business—McDill heard George Jones's A Good Year for the Roses. Then he got it. He realized that he had to love (good) country music in order to write it well. He couldn't fake it, and he realized that he didn't need to. He had everything he needed in his past and his memory. Daddy, gin, Hank Williams, and cape jasmine—all there.

Those who don't know me very well might think that my opinion comes from a certain partisan strain that I just can't hide—a need to defend a kind of country culture. No, far from it. I was ready to typecast this song in 1982, and would have had no problem tossing it into the ash heap. I couldn't though, and precisely because what is derisively termed "the dustbin of history"...is history.

You see, I study history. For a living. Studying history seriously (not just so that we can bolster our preconceived ideas) causes all sorts of problems for us mortals. It doesn't take long before we start to see that the world is complicated. Really complicated. Individual lives are woven in webs of social relationships and shared meanings, and we begin to realize that the way we look at the world today can't be transplanted onto the 1930s, 1940s, 1950s or beyond. We can't just plop into 1955 with our orange Gore-Tex vests and run with the in-crowd.
[e] Memory RF

So Uncle Remus and Stonewall Jackson give way to those Williams boys (Hank and Tennessee). Daddy is serious, loving, didactic, and drunk. The wind howls, but he's safely washed in the blood of the lamb. Off to sleep he drifts with John R., the Wolfman, and the gyrating cultural changes of rock (and roll). And Thomas Wolfe, for homeward-looking angels' sake.

Whoa.

It keeps on going. This is no facile ode to the farm, no little streetcar named simple country desire, no catharsis on a hot tin roof. The line that floors me to this day is "...learned to talk like the man on the six o-clock news." This is profound and, for me, quite poignant—a kind of Hunger of Memory for a country boy the world could easily stereotype...and dismiss. He makes life choices and practices diction while reading Tennessee Williams and Thomas Wolfe.

Pure country, huh?

Still sound simple? All of a sudden, I am thinking back to my own childhood, and certain books on the shelf that today would make me (and my parents) wince a little. What if I wrote a song about being lulled into sleep? How do I explain Kipling...and Kim?...or (found in grandma's attic) a story about tigers racing themselves into butter around a tree? As "progressive" as it felt to go to school in Madison, Wisconsin during the Vietnam War (we took the entire day off in elementary school to talk about the Kent State shootings) and to discuss anthropology and English literature with my parents (teachers 24/7), none of us would look at what we read and what we said in the 1960s and 1970s and say "that's exactly how I would say it—or even think it—now."
Note—Don't give up on Kipling.

Nope. Times change, and that rusty cliché is a lot more important than most of us realize. Study more history if this doesn't make sense. Really...study it.

[f[ Unexpected RF
So how do we combat this kind of "presentist" provincialism? There is only one way, it seems to me, and it lies in taking the past seriously, writing about it honestly, and letting partisans (of "either" persuasion) rant all they want. This is not new. Michel de Montaigne clearly understood that rich, layered detail always worked better in his Essais than prefiguring a story that would appeal readily to a perception of what readers "like."

Do you sense a parallel to my criticism of almost all Top-40 country music these days?

It's not just Montaigne, either. The godfather of the modern autobiography, Jean Jacques Rousseau, understood this implicitly at first...then quite explicitly as time went on. It is as though he wrote the following lines for interpreters of Good Ole Boys Like Me.
          I have entered upon a performance which is without example, whose 
          accomplishment will have no imitator. I mean to present my fellow-mortals 
          with a man in all the integrity of nature; and this man shall be myself. I know 
          my heart, and have studied mankind; I am not made like any one I have been
          acquainted with, perhaps like no one in existence; if not better, I at least claim
          originality, and whether Nature did wisely in breaking the mould with which she 
          formed me, can only be determined after having read this work.

          Whenever the last trumpet shall sound, I will present myself before the 
          sovereign judge with this book in my hand, and loudly proclaim, thus have I 
          acted; these were my thoughts; such was I. With equal freedom and veracity 
          have I related what was laudable or wicked, I have concealed no crimes, 
          added no virtues; and if I have sometimes introduced superfluous ornament, 
          it was merely to occupy a void occasioned by defect of memory: I may have 
          supposed that certain, which I only knew to be probable, but have never 
          asserted as truth, a conscious falsehood. Such as I was, I have declared 
          myself; sometimes vile and despicable, at others, virtuous, generous and 
          sublime; even as thou hast read my inmost soul: Power eternal assemble 
          round thy throne an innumerable throng of my fellow-mortals, let them listen to 
          my confessions, let them blush at my depravity, let them tremble at my 
          sufferings; let each in his turn expose with equal sincerity the failings, the
          wanderings of his heart, and, if he dare, aver, I was better than that man.[1]

[g] Forgotten RF
These words have had a greater influence on personal writing than perhaps any other in the Western intellectual tradition. Bob McDill seems to channel them in the lyrics, and Don Williams brings them to life. Tell it (Rousseau had a comparative handle on stuff that made readers blush), craft it (it is your memoir, and you have choices), and mean it.

That's autobiography. That's autobiographical song.
***  ***
The challenge in finding an East Asian poem, for the second week in a row, is too easy. And, for the second week in a row, I am determined (against all juxtaposing precedent) to take the easy path. There is method here. This kind of wistful, autobiographical lyric is so important to the Chinese poetic tradition that I want to show how it works. As I did last week, I am just opening the book to the "lyric" (詞) section and picking something. It is that prevalent...and that significant. While I would not expect this single (set of) lyrics to be "just like" Good Ole Boys" (and the very first line can only be understood by a Daoist), I trust that the tonal similarity will be clear enough.

   Tune: "Pleasure in Front of the Hall," Two Songs
     Lu Zhi (c.1246-c.1309)
                              [1]
     Be a loafer—
     Wash off the dust of fame and gain in the vast waves,
     Turn my head away from distant Ch'ang-an
     Content with my lot and my poverty.
     If I do not wear a turban and socks, 
     Who will blame me?
     Nothing disturbs my heart;
     I keep company with mists and clouds
     And have wind and moon for neighbors.
                                       —Translated by Sherwin S.S. Fu
                              [2]
     Wine in the cup is heavy.
     A calabash of spring color inebriates this old man of the mountain,
     A calabash of wine presses heavily on the flower stems.
     Following me, boy,
     Even when the calabash is dry, my merriment does not end.
     But who is with me
     To accompany me to the dark mountains?
     It is Lieh Tzu who rode the wind.
     Lieh Tzu rode the wind.
                                        —Translated by Hellmut Wilhelm[2]

Notes
[1] Jean Jacques Rousseau, Confessions [Translated by J. Cohen] (New York: Penguin Classics, 2005), 35.
[2]  Wu-chi Liu and Irving Yucheng Lo, Sunflower Splendor: Three Thousand Years of Chinese Poetry (Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press, 1974), 419.

Bibliography
Liu Wu-chi and Irving Yucheng Lo. Sunflower Splendor: Three Thousand Years of Chinese Poetry
     Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press, 1974.
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. Confessions [Translated by J. Cohen]. New York: Penguin Classics, 2005.

NEXT
Sunday, April 15th
Tonight the Bottle Let Me Down
We hit the hard stuff in two weeks. "Tonight," the bottle let Merle Haggard down. We'll examine the implications for liquid medication and memory.
[h] Contemplative RF